Cars are studied a lot. There are a lot of car studies released, so if you don’t like the results of one car study, you can wait an hour for the results of the next. There are studies of every wrinkle and difference in the life of a car. For example, did you know that Belgians are the most tense drivers in Europe? That women are more likely to get trapped after an accident? Did Subaru win first place in the American Automotive Study for Customer Satisfaction Index? Well, it’s all true. Studies prove it.
Every once in a while, a study comes along that gives you pause. Such was the case with disclosure from Cambridge Mobile Telematics (CMT) that Tesla drivers are 50 per cent less likely to crash while driving their Tesla vehicles “than any other vehicle they operate”. The same study found that Porsche drivers are 55 percent more likely to crash while driving their Porsche EV than any gas-combustion or hybrid vehicles they operate. CMT found that Tesla owners were 21 percent less likely to be distracted by their mobile devices when driving their electric vehicles than their other vehicles, and 9 percent less likely to exceed the speed limit.
The media picked up the “Tesla vs. Porsche” angle and reported it as if it was the only and most important result (the results were not made public). Incidentally, the title of the study is not (as one might suppose) “Tesla Turtles vs. Porsche Speed Freaks.” It’s “new research on CMT to be presented at the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety conference showing that electric vehicles have unique risk factors than conventional vehicles” and was delivered by Ryan McMahon, vice president of strategy at CMT, on May 24 in Ruckersville, Virginia. The full results — which examined variables such as driver fatigue, vehicle range, distracted driving and speed — will be revealed to those who signed up and attended the CMT webinar on June 16.
Did not matter. By May 30, people were reading copies with headlines like “En Porsche Taycan, vous avez plus de chances d’avoir un accident qu’en Tesla,” which translates to “In a Porsche Taycan, you’re more likely to have an accident than you were.” It’s in a Tesla car.”
The study’s announcement and reception epitomizes a phenomenon that comedian Arsenio Hall brilliantly summed up and celebrated by the C+C Music Factory in 1991 as “Things That Make You Go Hmmm”.
It raises a lot of questions.
Questions like, “How many vehicles do these people have?”
Do these Tesla owners keep some combustion-engine cars for the times they feel like emitting fumes, like “CO2 Tuesdays?” Perhaps they are driving more dangerous combustion cars because they intend to sell them soon and buy another Tesla.
Does Teslas have bumper stickers that read, “My other car is a 4WD SUV and I’m driving like crazy.”
I spoke with the Tesla owner to see if the results match his personal experience.
He told me that Tesla sensors help the driver be more aware of vehicles and other objects without causing them to become distracted. “The car is so smooth that, for whatever reason, I tend to sail more on the highway — somewhere around 110-120 kilometers per hour. With Subaru,” he said, “I feel like I need to speed up and slow down a lot.”
The risks associated with electric vehicles will have significant repercussions. The press release for the CMT study, for example, begins by noting that “drivers of electric vehicles have an acceleration risk of 180 to 340 percent higher than when driving conventional combustion vehicles.” This is an amazing number. How safe can it be to drive a Tesla Model S Plaid that can sprint to 60 mph in 2.1 seconds and reach a top speed of 322 kph compared to the Ford Mustang Shelby BGT500 which can sprint to 60 mph in just 3.3 seconds and reach To a top speed of 289 kilometers per hour? Not to mention the 2021 Honda Civic that does it in 8.1 seconds.
One explanation might be that hazards are often more related to the way people drive than to the vehicle they are driving. The nature of electric vehicles will change the way motorists navigate highways and city streets. According to McMahon, “Accidents are more likely to occur on long trips, but Tesla drivers have to stop and recharge more frequently and for longer than petrol-car drivers stop to refuel. This can create safer driving conditions due to fatigue… Long trips More dangerous, but there are breaks in flight from the EV that require people to stop.”
This is the positive side of self-driving electric vehicles. On the downside, researchers at the University of California, Irvine, have discovered that self-driving vehicles can be “tricked into sudden stops or unwanted driving behavior by placing an ordinary object on the side of the road.”
According to UCI Qi professor Alfred Chen, who co-authored a paper on the findings, self-driving vehicles cannot differentiate between objects on the road by chance and those left “on purpose as part of a physical denial of service attack.” Chen said, “It may be A box, a bicycle, or a traffic cone is all that is necessary to frighten a driverless vehicle into stopping dangerously in the middle of a street or on a highway ramp, creating a danger to motorists and other pedestrians.”
studies. They kind of look like cars. I can’t live with them. I cant live with out them.
Shopping for a new car? check the Globe Drive build and pricing tool See the latest discounts, discounts and prices on new cars, trucks and SUVs. click here to get your price.